It’s not surprising that 72% of college presidents agree or somewhat agree that their institution needs to make fundamental changes in its business models, programming, or other operations (Inside Higher Ed’s 2023 survey of presidents).
Or that roughly 40% of U.S. higher ed institutions are at, or nearing, financial risk, calculated by EY-Parthenon’s Institutional Viability Metric (IVM). Of these institutions, public campuses are less likely to be stable than their liberal arts and private, nonprofit counterparts.
And no wonder—in 1990, state-per-student funding was almost 140% more than that of the federal government. But in the last two decades, the gap between state and federal funding narrowed, with state funding per student only 12% above federal levels in 2015. This has dramatically changed the landscape of higher ed funding—federal funds are typically granted to individual students and research projects, while states typically support the general operations of public institutions. While not the only reason for this change, a lack of public trust in higher education is a big part of the challenge in advocating the value of an education to elected officials—only 51% of U.S. adults, down from 70% in 2013, consider a college education to be very important.
With a crisis of faith in the value of higher education and federal and state funding converging to similar levels, institutions are left to fill the gap. Endowments, gifts, and grants often come with restricted funds, athletic funds are usually re-distributed toward a variety of athletic expenses, and revenue from auxiliary services on public research campuses (e.g., housing, university bookstores, etc.) are often self-supporting, with little surplus to apply to operational expenses.
The situation leaves higher ed leaders with three obvious solutions: cut expenses, increase unrestricted funds (tuition and fees or giving), and/or increase demand.
We see these solutions play out in predictable ways on campuses.
Largely, these tactics may deliver short-term relief, but they don’t provide long-term results. And presidents know it.
This is the hard, necessary work to save higher education in the U.S. today. We must be focused on intentional, strategic, and informed ways to transform our campuses for long-term success. However this work requires expertise that is typically fairly new to campus administrators. If you’re a campus leader without experts who have industry experience in marketing, finance, sales, and change management on your staff, chances are you’re hearing the same recycled ideas I shared above that put you in an untenable position.
The thing is, three quarters of you know what you need to do, but you’re in an impossible position. As a campus executive, how can you expand your approach and support system to cut through the obvious solutions and instead solve the problems that will drive revenue and increase the long-term sustainability of your campus?
First, ensure your Northstar—long-term financial stability of your campus—guides all of your decisions and is appropriately contextualized. What are you willing to change as you seek this goal? What are you not willing to change? Make sure to share that with your campus leadership.
Evaluate and adjust how your campus delivers educational services. How well are your educators prepared to successfully transform their courses to an online experience? Virtual classes require different skill sets to deliver. Who might you be able to bring into your campus life with successful virtual classes, cohorts, or programs?
Your marketing teams can be a powerhouse for institutional change, helping bring to the table the right stakeholders to tell a differentiated brand story and build the top of the enrollment funnel.
Higher ed has a branding problem, but campuses can focus on what makes your campus unique to tell your brand story and how you support social mobility outcomes for your students.
The industry is facing a demographic shift as the traditional college-going population decreases and students from different backgrounds represent a community of new students to serve.
Returning to the Inside Higher Ed statistic, almost 75% of college presidents agree that fundamental changes are needed to ensure the success of their institution. What steps have you taken to move toward change on your campus? What roadblocks or successes have you encountered? As a higher ed success partner, I’m eager to hear from you.
We share three patterns we've seen emerge through years of studying higher education and its audiences through the lens of social listening research for six years and engagements with over 100 organizations. Take a deep dive into these patterns, the data supporting them, and the strategies you can use to break the patterns to make transformative progress in 2024.